From the Bench

 

GOING TO THE DOGS IN ’04

One of the Queen’s dogs is dead. Well, you say, she still has seven corgis left. No matter. The elderly victim was one of her favorites.

Now, the Queen can perhaps make do with only four Rolls, five or six palaces, and one consort (that we know of). But to give up one of her corgis a bit much.

I would not bring this sad subject up, but after woefully neglecting "The Bench" in ’03 due to a minor health detour, I determined to do better in ’04, no matter how mundane the subject. And being desperate for a column idea, the royal family’s dogs looked to be about as mundane as it gets. Can’t be much worse than Entertainment Tonight, "Today" on NBC, or Oprah.

Besides, dogs provide an even better source of ideas than the royal family. Just ask a dog fanatic about his/her dog(s) and, once you escape, you have at least ten ridiculous column inspirations (Cat extremists are even worse.)

The worst part of the royal tragedy is that Princess Anne’s bull terriers did the corgi in. Apparently, not only can’t Elizabeth and Philip control their offspring, they can’t even control their kids’ dogs. (Unfortunately, spaying and neutering of either species is forbidden in the royal household. Otherwise, a lot of the Queen’s problems could be solved.)

There can be no excuse for this lapse of royal security. There were warning signs. The princess had earlier paid a hefty fine for the aggressive behavior of her dog. (We just heard, as we finalized this column, that the beast bit a maid several days back, not nearly as serious, of course, as attacking the Queen’s dog, but serious enough, perhaps, to exhaust the royal patience.)

It was not reported what penalty, if any, Her Royal Highness exacted of the princess and her dogs for the murder. Probably none, if the behavior of the royal offspring over the years is any indication. It is obvious that the royals have been too busy launching ships, reviewing troops, and knighting nondescript entertainers to have anything to do with child rearing or discipline.

My wife would have made short work of such royal foolishness, either from the kids or the dogs. None of our three, or their dachshund, got by with much.

“Straighten up or I’m gonna jerk a knot in your tail,” Mama would warn.

She never did it, of course. I’m not sure it is even anatomically possible, but the threat was effective.

The Queen of England could not be expected to stoop to such common language; however, royal behavior, like that of most of the later generations, seems to have deteriorated.

In the coming months, this space will be voicing our opinions of these younger generations more forcefully, from Bush right on down to Franklin County, from Iraq and the economy to county zoning, dog control, and the school board.

So look for no-holds-barred comments this year. And keep your comments to yourself, or I’ll sic Mama on you. She’ll jerk a knot in your tail.

Ó2004        Dave Nelson

 



For previous columns, go to "Archives"

 

This page has been accessed times since Monday, June 24, 2002